: New firmware version 1.0.5.1 is available for EOS C70 : Help ensure your autofocus is properly aligned with a Canon Precision Alignment
: New firmware version 1.4.1 is available for EOS R3 Maybe someone else can post their experience here also. The Sigma 600c with adapter and TC is pretty unwieldy. I am holding out until next June for Canon to make another RF super zoom in this range without the limitation.
If the 100~500 worked below 300mm with a 1.4x TC, I'd be done lens wise. I wanted IS and the Canon equivalent didn't have it. Its what got me using Sigma with my last body. I understand your reasoning for wanting to use your Zeiss equipment. I have some commitments today, but tomorrow I'll put one on my R5 C and see what metadata it outputs. I have a few Sigma lenses also, but all of these are supported in DxO.
Error exiftool not found download#
Previously, DxO says hey this looks like a new lens, you want to download an optics module for it? At this point, The only lens I own that isn't supported is my 12mm Rokinon Fisheye and I can do my own lens optimizations for it when needed. Usually, it just states no optics module for this lens. I haven't pumped anything into DPP recently to see what lens data it shows. I use DxO for my post and it supports Canon + 3rd party lenses. I have used many 3rd party lenses with my older Canon gear and had fantastic results. People have already speculated that Canon might open up 3rd party lens inclusion to the R platform at some point, some day. Do they want to sell you lenses too, sure.
If they want to walk away from Canon's superior color science (my opinion there), they may do so. There were recently a few topics on this with some voicing their dissatisfaction with Canon and "threatening" to abandon ship. Canon doesn't really have any reason to ensure compliance with 3rd party equipment, and as you pointed out, its works perfectly with Canon glass. Interesting topic, but I'm not surprised. It works perfectly fine when a Canon lens is attached, so the camera does fill metadata fields.Īt least the following 2 threads confirm what I have:Īnd both say it is a Canon bug.With the way Canon is keeping everything close to the chest nowadays, "forbidding" 3rd party lensmakers to use the RF-mount, I would not be surprised if Canon decided not to fill the lensmaker-details in the correct metadata fields in-camera in case the lens is non-Canon.But of course that is speculation.ĭoes anyone experience the same issue and maybe have a solution, or must the solution indeed come from Canon?īefore we get into this conversation, can you tell us what EF to RF adapter you are using? If its not Canon, that alone might be the cause. My guess is that Canon does not fill the proper metadata fields in-camera in case of 3rd party lenses. I use firmware 1.4.0 on the R6 due to the AF-issues in later versions (hesitant to try 1.6.0). So the camera seems the only common denominator. So I don't think creating a ticket at Flickr makes sense, since it is already missing in the Lightroom library.Īfter that, I thought it was Adobe reading the wrong metadata fields from the camera, but I have been using LR for ages, and it doesn't matter which version of LR I use (of course I always keep it up to date), because I don't have this problem when using the 6D. When I attach Canon lenses (16-35, 70-200, 100-400 etc) to the R6, it works fine: In case of a picture taken with the 6D, I do see the lensinformation with all my Zeiss lenses: While I see this on Flickr when the picture was taken with a Canon 6D:įlickr only shows what is present in the file, so I checked Lightroom, and I see that in case of 3rd party lenses (in this case a 135 apo sonnar) that no lensmaker info is shown, only the focal length on the R6: Ever since I got my Canon R6, Flickr won't display lensmaker information in case 3rd party lenses are attached.
0 kommentar(er)
